https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199409 A writ challenge to Labour Court proceedings under the Payment of Wages Act was considered premature where the matter was only at the stage of admission notice under Section 15(2). The grievance regarding alleged unlawful deduction or delayed payment could still be raised before the competent authority at final adjudication under Section 15(3). A notice in Form E under the Payment of Wages (Procedure) Rules, 1937 was treated as the prescribed statutory format and, by itself, did not indicate haste or denial of hearing. In these circumstances, writ interference was not warranted. en-us Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 27 Feb 2018 20:20:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199409 A writ challenge to Labour Court proceedings under the Payment of Wages Act was considered premature where the matter was only at the stage of admission notice under Section 15(2). The grievance regarding alleged unlawful deduction or delayed payment could still be raised before the competent authority at final adjudication under Section 15(3). A notice in Form E under the Payment of Wages (Procedure) Rules, 1937 was treated as the prescribed statutory format and, by itself, did not indicate haste or denial of hearing. In these circumstances, writ interference was not warranted. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 11 Jul 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=199409