Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order levying entertainment tax was liable to be quashed for failure to consider the assessee's objections to the proposition notice and for not being a speaking order.
Analysis: The assessment order recorded only that the objections were gone through and found untenable, but it did not disclose what the objections were or why they were rejected. Such a cryptic disposal did not reflect application of mind to the reply filed by the assessee and amounted to non-consideration of the objections. A taxing authority must pass a reasoned order after considering the assessee's response, and where the objections are ignored, the order cannot stand.
Conclusion: The assessment order was quashed in favour of the appellant/assessee, and the Assessing Officer was directed to reconsider the reply and pass a reasoned and speaking order after granting opportunity of hearing, if necessary.
Final Conclusion: The impugned assessment was set aside for breach of the duty to consider objections and to issue a speaking order, leaving the tax liability to be redetermined afresh in accordance with law.
Ratio Decidendi: An assessment order that fails to consider the assessee's objections and does not give reasons for rejecting them is unsustainable for violation of natural justice and must be replaced by a reasoned decision.