Bona fide pre-winding-up transfer upheld where board approval, payment, and completion acts predated the winding-up petition

A pre-winding-up transfer of company property was analysed as a bona fide sale for valuable consideration where board approval, substantial payment, and possession-related acts had occurred before the winding-up petition. On those facts, the transaction was treated as completed more than one year before the petition and was not characterised as a fraudulent preference or void transfer under the Companies Act. The related applications for consequential relief also failed because they depended on the same invalidity challenge. The transfer was therefore left undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: Whether the agreement for sale and subsequent transfer of the company's property were void as a fraudulent preference or a void transfer under the Companies Act, and whether the applicants were entitled to the consequential reliefs sought.

Analysis: The transfer was held to have originated in a board-approved arrangement of 1996, with substantial payments made by July 1998 and possession-related incidents such as tenant attornment occurring before the winding-up petition. These surrounding circumstances supported the genuineness of the transaction, its completion more than one year before presentation of the petition, and its character as a bona fide transfer for valuable consideration. On that basis, the transaction was found not to attract the avoidance provisions relied upon by the applicants. The additional applications founded on the same alleged invalidity also failed once the underlying transfer challenge was rejected.

Conclusion: The challenge to the transfer failed, and the applications were rejected.

Final Conclusion: The Court found no merit in the applicants' case and declined to grant any relief, leaving the transfer undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: A pre-winding-up transfer supported by board resolutions, substantial payment, and surrounding acts of completion, and shown to be bona fide and for valuable consideration, does not fall within the avoidance provisions merely because a later document or formal completion step is executed after the petition.

---