<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 666 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197950</link>
    <description>A pre-winding-up transfer of company property was analysed as a bona fide sale for valuable consideration where board approval, substantial payment, and possession-related acts had occurred before the winding-up petition. On those facts, the transaction was treated as completed more than one year before the petition and was not characterised as a fraudulent preference or void transfer under the Companies Act. The related applications for consequential relief also failed because they depended on the same invalidity challenge. The transfer was therefore left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jan 2018 16:00:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=505096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 666 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197950</link>
      <description>A pre-winding-up transfer of company property was analysed as a bona fide sale for valuable consideration where board approval, substantial payment, and possession-related acts had occurred before the winding-up petition. On those facts, the transaction was treated as completed more than one year before the petition and was not characterised as a fraudulent preference or void transfer under the Companies Act. The related applications for consequential relief also failed because they depended on the same invalidity challenge. The transfer was therefore left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=197950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>