Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the defendants infringed the plaintiff's copyright and trade mark rights by supplying computers pre-loaded with unauthorized software, and whether the plaintiff was entitled to injunctions, delivery up, and damages.
Analysis: The evidence established that the plaintiff was the registered proprietor of the MICROSOFT trade mark and the copyright owner of the relevant software programs. The defendants, though served, did not appear and were proceeded ex parte. The affidavit evidence, including the purchaser's statement and the technical expert's report, showed that computers sold by the defendants were loaded with pirated versions of the plaintiff's software without licence or permission. The court found that the defendants were engaged in a business of supplying infringing copies, that the infringement was proved on unrebutted evidence, and that the plaintiff was entitled to protection against further misuse of its intellectual property rights. On the evidence, damages were also held to be recoverable, and the accounts remedy was treated as unnecessary.
Conclusion: The issue was decided in favour of the plaintiff. The plaintiff was held entitled to injunctive relief, delivery up of infringing material, and damages of Rs. 19.75 lakhs with interest and costs.