Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interim reliefs could be granted in a company petition when the applicants' status as shareholders and directors was seriously disputed, the balance consideration under the memorandum of understanding remained unpaid, and the reliefs sought were not in aid of the main petition.
Analysis: The parties' rights were founded on a memorandum of understanding that contemplated staged payment, transfer of shares, and execution of definitive agreements. The applicants had paid only part of the consideration, while the respondents relied on the contractual terms and an undertaking that the shares would revert on default. The applicants' claim to continue as shareholders and directors was therefore seriously in issue. The Tribunal also found that the interim prayers were independent of and not ancillary to the principal reliefs in the main petition. In these circumstances, and in view of the unresolved dispute over entitlement under the memorandum and the pending reference to arbitration, the applicants had not established a sufficient basis for interim protection.
Conclusion: Interim relief was not granted and the application was dismissed against the applicants.
Ratio Decidendi: Interim relief cannot be granted where the applicant's entitlement to membership or management rights is seriously disputed and the interim prayers are not in aid of the substantive reliefs sought.