Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a valid charter party and arbitration agreement existed between the parties so as to require reference of the dispute to arbitration under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Analysis: The record showed a signed charter party, contemporaneous correspondence, a fixture note, and a bill of lading referring to the shipment arrangement and the London forum. Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 recognises an arbitration agreement in a signed document or in exchanged communications evidencing agreement, and does not require the arbitration clause to be reproduced in every communication. The challenge that no original agreement had been filed was rejected because Section 45 does not insist on production of the original where the agreement's existence and authenticity are otherwise established. The Court also noted that objections as to the existence of the agreement could be urged before the arbitral tribunal, which has competence to rule on its own jurisdiction.
Conclusion: A valid arbitration agreement existed and the dispute was rightly referred to arbitration under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Ratio Decidendi: An arbitration agreement may be inferred from a signed charter party and the surrounding exchange of communications, and once its existence is established, the court must refer the parties to arbitration unless the agreement is shown to be null, void, inoperative, or incapable of being performed.