Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the proposed scheme of arrangement, which included demerger along with reduction of share premium account and reduction and reconstruction of capital, could be sanctioned despite the absence of a separately worded special resolution for reduction.
Analysis: The scheme was approved by the shareholders and creditors after notice, the requisite majority of unsecured creditors and share applicants consented, and the companies' articles authorized reduction of capital and share premium. The Court held that where the reduction is an integral part of a composite scheme, the procedure under the Companies Act, 1956 governing reduction of capital must be substantially complied with. Applying the Duomatic principle, the Court found that unanimous or overwhelming informed shareholder assent to the scheme could satisfy the substance of the requirement for a special resolution, even if the reduction was not separately described in formal terms. The scheme was also found to be fair, reasonable, and not prejudicial to members or creditors.
Conclusion: The scheme of arrangement was sanctionable, and the reduction of share premium and capital was validly confirmed.
Final Conclusion: The composite restructuring scheme was approved, and the reductions in share premium and capital were confirmed as part of the sanctioned arrangement.
Ratio Decidendi: A scheme of arrangement that necessarily includes reduction of capital or share premium may be sanctioned under the company court's jurisdiction when the articles permit such reduction, the members and creditors have been duly informed and have approved it with the requisite majority or unanimous assent, and substantial compliance with the reduction procedure is established.