<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 893 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196628</link>
    <description>A composite scheme of arrangement combining demerger with reduction of share premium and capital may be sanctioned where the articles permit such reduction and the members and creditors have been duly informed and approved the scheme with the requisite consent. The Court applied the Duomatic principle to hold that, in a composite restructuring, the substance of a special resolution can be satisfied by unanimous or overwhelming informed shareholder assent even if the reduction is not separately worded. It further treated substantial compliance with the capital reduction procedure as sufficient and noted that the scheme was fair, reasonable, and not prejudicial to members or creditors. The reduction of share premium and capital was therefore confirmed as part of the sanctioned arrangement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2021 15:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=499197" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 893 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196628</link>
      <description>A composite scheme of arrangement combining demerger with reduction of share premium and capital may be sanctioned where the articles permit such reduction and the members and creditors have been duly informed and approved the scheme with the requisite consent. The Court applied the Duomatic principle to hold that, in a composite restructuring, the substance of a special resolution can be satisfied by unanimous or overwhelming informed shareholder assent even if the reduction is not separately worded. It further treated substantial compliance with the capital reduction procedure as sufficient and noted that the scheme was fair, reasonable, and not prejudicial to members or creditors. The reduction of share premium and capital was therefore confirmed as part of the sanctioned arrangement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=196628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>