Winding up petition upheld due to lack of defense & non-payment

The Company Court upheld the winding up petition against the appellant due to lack of bonafide defense and failure to pay admitted liability. The appellant's disputes over settlement terms and non-compliance led to the court appointing a Provisional Liquidator for the company. Despite various settlement proposals and opportunities, the appellant's defense was deemed not genuine, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal and enforcement of the winding up petition.

---

---

Issues involved: Winding up petition, bonafide defense, admitted liability, one time settlement, failure to pay, dispute on settlement amount, company's financial status, estoppel, lapsing of settlement offer, liability amount in Balance Sheet, compliance with settlement terms.

Summary:
The appeal challenged the Company Court's order admitting a winding up petition due to the appellant's lack of bonafide defense and unwillingness to pay the admitted liability. The respondents had provided a loan to the appellant, who defaulted due to setbacks in the State excise policy. Despite various settlement proposals, the appellant failed to make payments, leading to the winding up petition. The appellant disputed the settlement terms and failed to comply with offers, leading to the court appointing a Provisional Liquidator.

The Company Court found that the appellant's defense was not bona fide and that they were unwilling to pay the admitted liability. Despite multiple settlement proposals and opportunities, the appellant failed to make payments or reach a resolution with the respondents. The court dismissed the appeal, upholding the winding up petition and appointing a Provisional Liquidator for the appellant company.

---