<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (5) TMI 959 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195973</link>
    <description>The Company Court upheld the winding up petition against the appellant due to lack of bonafide defense and failure to pay admitted liability. The appellant&#039;s disputes over settlement terms and non-compliance led to the court appointing a Provisional Liquidator for the company. Despite various settlement proposals and opportunities, the appellant&#039;s defense was deemed not genuine, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal and enforcement of the winding up petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2017 18:11:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=496302" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (5) TMI 959 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195973</link>
      <description>The Company Court upheld the winding up petition against the appellant due to lack of bonafide defense and failure to pay admitted liability. The appellant&#039;s disputes over settlement terms and non-compliance led to the court appointing a Provisional Liquidator for the company. Despite various settlement proposals and opportunities, the appellant&#039;s defense was deemed not genuine, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal and enforcement of the winding up petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195973</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>