CLB authorizes sole shareholder to conduct EGM, appoint new directors

The Company Law Board authorized the Petitioner, holding 99.9996% share capital, to call and conduct an Extraordinary General Meeting due to the lack of directors on the Board. With only one shareholder available, the CLB granted approval for the Petitioner to act as the sole member constituting the meeting, allowing the EGM to proceed with appointing new directors for the company's functioning. The CLB directed the EGM to take place on a specified date and time for the necessary proceedings, disposing of the Company Petition.

---

---

Issues:
1. Calling and conducting an Extraordinary General Meeting by the sole shareholder.
2. Allowing the sole shareholder to constitute the quorum for the meeting.
3. Authorization for newly appointed directors to make filings with the Registrar of Companies.
4. Giving ancillary or consequential directions regarding the meeting, Companies Act, and Articles of Association.
5. Seeking further orders as deemed fit by the Company Law Board.

Analysis:
1. The Petitioner, holding 99.9996% share capital of the Respondent Company, sought approval to call and conduct an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) as there were no directors on the Board. The Petitioner proposed appointing new directors for the smooth functioning of the company.

2. With only one shareholder available, including a resigned shareholder holding one share, it was impracticable to call a general meeting due to the lack of a quorum. The Company Law Board (CLB) noted that invoking jurisdiction under section 186 of the Companies Act, 1956, was necessary to hold the EGM.

3. Under section 186 of the Companies Act, 1956, when it is impracticable to hold a general meeting, a member or director can call a meeting with the leave of the CLB. In this case, since there were no continuing directors and only one shareholder, the CLB authorized the Petitioner to call, hold, and conduct the EGM.

4. The CLB determined that no special direction was needed for the appointment of directors as the EGM had the power to make such decisions without additional instructions. The Board emphasized that the EGM could proceed with its existing powers.

5. Consequently, the Company Petition was disposed of, with the CLB granting approval for the Petitioner to hold the EGM, authorizing the Petitioner to act as the sole member constituting the meeting. The CLB directed the EGM to take place on a specified date and time for the necessary proceedings.

---