Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the plaintiffs were entitled to final judgment on a summary application under Chapter XIIIA, and whether the defendant, having raised a triable issue, could be required to furnish security or pay the arrears into Court as a condition for leave to defend.
Analysis: The defendant's affidavit disclosed a defence which could not be dismissed as sham, illusory, or practically moonshine, and the dispute raised serious questions requiring trial. The Court reviewed English authorities construing the corresponding summary judgment rules and drew the distinction between cases where the plaintiff is clearly entitled to judgment, cases where a bona fide triable issue is raised, and cases where the defence is so weak that the plaintiff may be protected by security. It held that where the defendant raises a triable issue and is entitled to defend, the Court should not impose payment into Court or security in a manner that would make the leave to defend illusory.
Conclusion: The plaintiffs were not entitled to final judgment at this stage, and the defendant was entitled to unconditional leave to defend without being compelled to furnish security or pay the claimed amount into Court.
Final Conclusion: Summary judgment was refused, the defence was allowed to proceed, and the suit was directed to continue in the ordinary course.
Ratio Decidendi: Under the summary judgment procedure, security or payment into Court cannot be imposed as a condition for leave to defend where the defendant has raised a bona fide triable issue; such conditions are reserved for cases where the plaintiff is otherwise entitled to judgment and mercy alone is extended to the defendant.