<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1945 (1) TMI 19 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195743</link>
    <description>In a Chapter XIIIA summary procedure, the Calcutta HC held that final judgment could not be granted where the defendant&#039;s affidavit disclosed a bona fide triable issue and the defence was not sham, illusory, or practically moonshine. The Court distinguished cases where the plaintiff is clearly entitled to judgment from cases where a real defence requires trial, and held that security or payment into Court should not be imposed as a condition of leave to defend if that would make the leave illusory. The plaintiffs were therefore denied final judgment at that stage, and the defendant received unconditional leave to defend.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 1945 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2017 14:25:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=495338" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1945 (1) TMI 19 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195743</link>
      <description>In a Chapter XIIIA summary procedure, the Calcutta HC held that final judgment could not be granted where the defendant&#039;s affidavit disclosed a bona fide triable issue and the defence was not sham, illusory, or practically moonshine. The Court distinguished cases where the plaintiff is clearly entitled to judgment from cases where a real defence requires trial, and held that security or payment into Court should not be imposed as a condition of leave to defend if that would make the leave illusory. The plaintiffs were therefore denied final judgment at that stage, and the defendant received unconditional leave to defend.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jan 1945 00:00:00 +0630</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=195743</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>