Vicarious liability in cheque dishonour complaints requires specific role pleadings and careful pre-summoning scrutiny before summons issue.

Vicarious criminal liability under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act does not arise merely from a company officer's designation; the complaint must specifically plead how and in what manner each accused was in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the company's business at the relevant time. Bare repetition of the statutory language is insufficient. Managing Directors and Joint Managing Directors are ordinarily covered by virtue of office, and the cheque signatory may be liable on the basis of his own act. Before issuing summons, the Magistrate should conduct meaningful scrutiny of supporting materials, including director particulars, cheque and dishonour details, the role of each proposed accused, and notice-related information.

---

---

Issues: Whether complaints under Section 138 read with Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 can proceed against company officers without specific averments showing that they were in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the company's business, and what safeguards a Magistrate should while issuing summons in such cases.

Analysis: The legal position was reiterated that vicarious criminal liability under Section 141 does not arise merely from designation or office in the company. The complaint must specifically plead how and in what manner the accused was in charge of and responsible for the conduct of the business at the relevant time. Mere reproduction of the statutory language is insufficient. Managing Director and Joint Managing Director are ordinarily covered by virtue of their office, and the signatory of the cheque is also liable on the basis of his own act. For ensuring proper scrutiny at the summoning stage, the Magistrate was directed to seek Form-32 and other particulars showing the identity of directors, the cheque details, dishonour particulars, the role of each person sought to be made liable, and notice-related details before issuing process.

Conclusion: Specific pleadings of role and are necessary to fasten vicarious liability under Section 141, and summons in such complaints should issue only after meaningful pre-summoning scrutiny of the materials placed by the complainant.

---