Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the requirement of convening meetings of the equity shareholders, preference shareholders, secured creditors and unsecured creditors of the applicant companies for approval of the proposed Scheme of Amalgamation should be dispensed with.
Analysis: The application was moved under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956. The registered offices of both companies were within the jurisdiction of the Court, the Boards of Directors had unanimously approved the scheme, and the relevant shareholding and creditor positions were placed on record. The equity shareholders, preference shareholders and unsecured creditor of each company had furnished written consents or no objections, which were verified and found to be in order. There were no secured creditors of either company on the relevant date, and no proceedings under Sections 235 to 251 of the Companies Act, 1956 were pending against the companies.
Conclusion: The requirement of convening the meetings of the equity shareholders, preference shareholders and unsecured creditors of both companies was dispensed with, and the application was allowed.