Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether arrears of sales tax due from a company could be recovered from a resigned director when the company had not been wound up or placed in liquidation.
Analysis: The liability provisions relied upon by the revenue fastened responsibility on directors only in the event of winding up or liquidation of the company. Section 19-B of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act applied where a private company was wound up, and Section 18 of the Central Sales Tax Act likewise contemplated recovery from a director only where a private company was wound up and the tax could not be recovered in liquidation. The petitioner had resigned long before the impugned recovery, and the company was admittedly still in existence and not wound up. In these circumstances, the statutory conditions for proceeding personally against the petitioner were absent.
Conclusion: The recovery proceedings against the petitioner were without jurisdiction and could not be sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Personal recovery of company tax arrears from a director is permissible only where the governing statute expressly authorises it in the context of winding up or liquidation and the statutory preconditions are satisfied.