Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI Drafter

Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.

Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review

The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.

• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required


Step 2 – Draft Generation

Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.

• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review.

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2001 (12) TMI 887

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ing the changes in the Directorships of the Company. It is the case of the petitioner that he had no connection whatsoever with the said Company after his resignation. In or about November, 1995 the petitioner received a notice from the first respondent alleging that a sales tax of Rs. 3,09,165 was due from the Company towards the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax and the Central Sales Tax for the year 1981-82. Since the petitioner had nothing to do with the Company, he did not reply for the same. Now, the petitioner received the impugned notice dated 31.10.2001 from the first respondent to recover the said amount under the Revenue Recovery Act. So the petitioner has filed the above writ petition challenging the jurisdiction of the respondent....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....her amount payable under this Act by such company whether assessment is made prior to or after such winding up unless he proves that the non-payment of lax cannot be attributed to any gross neglect misfeasance or breach of duty on his part in relation to the affairs of the company." Even the said provision will apply only if a Company had wound up and to the directors who hold the said status at the time of winding up of the company. That is not the case here. So Section 19-B does not empower the authorities to take recovery proceedings against the petitioner. Section 19-A of the Act will apply regarding the liability of the partitioned Hindu family, dissolved firm etc. The said provision also cannot be made applicable to the petition....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ld as follows; "6. On the other hand, the learned Special Government Pleader for Taxes meekly attempt to support the impugned action. Section 16-B of the APGST Act reads: "Liability of directors or a private company in liquidation.- When any private company is wound up and any tax assessed on the company under this Act for any period, whether before or in the course of or after its liquidation, cannot be recovered, then every person who was a director of the private company at any time during the period for which the tax is due, shall be jointly and severally liable for the payment, of such tax, unless he proves that the non-recovery cannot be attributed to any gross neglect, misfeasance or breach of duty....