Penalties not applicable to sole proprietorship per Bombay HC ruling The Bombay HC dismissed the appeal, ruling that penalties were not applicable to a sole proprietary concern, and the sole proprietor was not required to ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Penalties not applicable to sole proprietorship per Bombay HC ruling
The Bombay HC dismissed the appeal, ruling that penalties were not applicable to a sole proprietary concern, and the sole proprietor was not required to pay penalties separately. This decision was influenced by a precedent involving Gyanchand Jain.
The Bombay High Court dismissed the appeal as the penalties were set aside for a sole proprietary concern, stating that the sole proprietor need not pay penalty separately. The decision was based on a similar case involving Gyanchand Jain.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.