Company contravention liability under the Essential Commodities Act can proceed against officers even without prosecuting the company separately.

Section 10 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 was construed to allow prosecution of persons in charge, directors, managers, secretaries or other officers for a company's contravention without the company itself being separately arraigned, so long as the contravention by the company is proved. The provision was read as making the company and the specified persons amenable to prosecution singly or together, and simultaneous prosecution of the company was held not to be a condition precedent. The prosecutions were therefore maintainable, and the challenge to their continuance failed.

---

---

Issues: Whether, under section 10 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, the directors, officers or persons in charge of a company can be prosecuted and punished for contravention by the company without the company itself being prosecuted.

Analysis: Section 10 was held to be plain in its language. It contemplates liability where the contravention of an order under section 3 is by a company, and it specifies the classes of persons who may also be proceeded against: the company itself, every person in charge and responsible for its conduct of business, and any director, manager, secretary or other officer whose consent, connivance or neglect caused the offence. The provision was read as permitting prosecution of any one or more of these persons, either singly or along with the company. The only essential requirement is proof that the contravention was by the company; simultaneous arraignment of the company is not a condition precedent to prosecuting the persons covered by the section.

Conclusion: The persons in charge or other officers of a company may be prosecuted even if the company is not separately prosecuted, provided the contravention by the company is established.

Final Conclusion: The appeals failed because the prosecutions were held maintainable in law and the challenge to their continuance was rejected.

Ratio Decidendi: Section 10 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 creates liability for company-related contraventions without requiring the company itself to be arraigned, so long as the contravention by the company is proved.

---