Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2014 (3) TMI 1082 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal rules in favor of assessee, exempts AOP income under Income Tax Act The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the amount received from the AOP constituted a share of profit and was exempt under Section ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal rules in favor of assessee, exempts AOP income under Income Tax Act

                          The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, determining that the amount received from the AOP constituted a share of profit and was exempt under Section 167B(2) and Section 86 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal rejected the Assessing Officer's argument that the amount was consideration for the transfer of development rights. Additionally, the Tribunal found that the assessee was entitled to deduction under Section 80IB(10). The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order and holding in favor of the assessee on all grounds.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Taxability of the amount received by the assessee from the AOP.
                          2. Applicability of Section 167B and Section 86 of the Income Tax Act.
                          3. Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer in reassessment proceedings.
                          4. Entitlement to deduction under Section 80IB(10).

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Taxability of the amount received by the assessee from the AOP:
                          The primary issue was whether the amount received by the assessee, a private limited company engaged in real estate development, from an Association of Persons (AOP) named Fortaleza Developers should be taxed as business receipts or as a share of profit exempt under Section 167B(2). The Assessing Officer (AO) argued that the assessee received a fixed 35% of the gross sale proceeds from the AOP, which constituted consideration for the transfer of development rights rather than a share of profit. This was based on the clauses of the AOP agreement and the statements of the assessee's director. The AO emphasized that the assessee's entitlement was to a share in the gross receipts, not the profit, and thus, the exemption under Section 167B(2) was not applicable.

                          2. Applicability of Section 167B and Section 86 of the Income Tax Act:
                          The assessee contended that the amount received from the AOP was indeed its share of profit and should be exempt under Section 167B(2) and Section 86, which stipulate that income tax is not payable by an assessee in respect of its share in the income of an AOP. The CIT(A) rejected this contention, holding that the amount received was not a share of profit but consideration for the transfer of development rights, and thus, the provisions of Sections 67A, 86, and 167B did not apply. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision to treat the amount as business receipts.

                          3. Jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer in reassessment proceedings:
                          The assessee argued that the AO had no jurisdiction to make the addition in reassessment proceedings, as the assessment was based on the same grounds as a previous assessment year where the AOP was assessed as a valid entity. The CIT(A) did not address this argument fully. The Tribunal noted that the issue of jurisdiction was academic in nature since the primary grounds were decided in favor of the assessee.

                          4. Entitlement to deduction under Section 80IB(10):
                          The assessee also argued that the income received from the AOP should be entitled to deduction under Section 80IB(10), which pertains to profits from developing and building housing projects. The CIT(A) did not accept this alternate contention. However, the Tribunal found that the Mumbai Bench of the Tribunal, in the case of the AOP, had already decided that the 35% share received by the assessee was indeed a share of profit and not in the nature of overriding title to the revenue. Therefore, the Tribunal allowed the grounds raised by the assessee, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order and holding that the amount received was a share of profit, thus exempt under Section 167B(2).

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, concluding that the amount received from the AOP was a share of profit and not consideration for the transfer of development rights. This share of profit was exempt under Section 167B(2) and Section 86 of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal also noted that the issue of jurisdiction was academic and did not require adjudication. The appeals filed by the assessee were allowed.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found