TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>ITAT Mumbai rules for assessee on depreciation but upholds disallowance on revenue expenditure.</h1> <h3>M/s. Filmkraft Productions (I) Ltd. Versus The Addl CIT, Range-11 (1), Mumbai</h3> M/s. Filmkraft Productions (I) Ltd. Versus The Addl CIT, Range-11 (1), Mumbai - TMI Issues:1. Disallowance of depreciation claimed on sale of machinery and equipment.2. Disallowance of revenue expenditure of Rs. 2,00,00,000.3. Disallowance made under section 14A read with Rule 8D.Issue 1 - Disallowance of depreciation claimed on sale of machinery and equipment:The assessee appealed against the disallowance of Rs. 33,75,231 out of depreciation claimed on the sale of machinery and equipment. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the amount, stating that the block of asset pertaining to plant and machinery cannot be set off against the written down value (WDV) of motor cars. However, the ITAT Mumbai, after considering the definition of block of assets under Section 2(11) of the Act and relevant case law, held that plant and machinery and motor cars fall within the same block of assets as they have the same rate of depreciation. Citing the decision of the Hon'ble High Court of Delhi, the ITAT allowed the appeal and directed the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 33,75,231.Issue 2 - Disallowance of revenue expenditure of Rs. 2,00,00,000:The AO disallowed Rs. 2,00,00,000 claimed as revenue expenditure, considering it as the acquisition cost of an intangible asset. The assessee argued that the payment was compensatory in nature and not for acquiring any copyright. However, based on the Consent Terms between the parties, it was evident that the assessee acquired the musical composition 'THUMP' and the payment was considered as the cost of acquiring an intangible asset. The ITAT upheld the AO's decision, as confirmed by the Ld. CIT(A), dismissing the appeal on this ground.Issue 3 - Disallowance made under section 14A read with Rule 8D:The AO disallowed Rs. 5,72,047 under section 14A read with Rule 8D, pertaining to exempt income from Mutual Fund dividend. The assessee contended that no expenditure was incurred for earning the exempt income. However, the AO computed the disallowance based on Rule 8D, as upheld by the Ld. CIT(A). The ITAT found the computation of disallowance to be in accordance with the law and rejected the assessee's claim that no expenses were incurred for earning the dividend income. Therefore, the ITAT partly allowed the appeal filed by the assessee.In conclusion, the ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee on the disallowance of depreciation claimed on the sale of machinery and equipment, but upheld the disallowance of revenue expenditure and the disallowance made under section 14A read with Rule 8D. The appeal was partly allowed by the ITAT.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
