<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (7) TMI 1193 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190523</link>
    <description>The ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of depreciation claimed on the sale of machinery and equipment, directing the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 33,75,231. However, the disallowance of revenue expenditure of Rs. 2,00,00,000 and the disallowance made under section 14A read with Rule 8D were upheld by the ITAT. The appeal was partly allowed by the ITAT, with the assessee succeeding on one issue and failing on the other two issues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 10:17:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=458952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (7) TMI 1193 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190523</link>
      <description>The ITAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the assessee regarding the disallowance of depreciation claimed on the sale of machinery and equipment, directing the AO to delete the addition of Rs. 33,75,231. However, the disallowance of revenue expenditure of Rs. 2,00,00,000 and the disallowance made under section 14A read with Rule 8D were upheld by the ITAT. The appeal was partly allowed by the ITAT, with the assessee succeeding on one issue and failing on the other two issues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=190523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>