TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue was entitled to stay of the operation of the impugned order-in-appeal pending disposal of the appeal.
Analysis: The authorities below had recorded reasons for allowing the refund claim under Notification No. 33/99-CE dated 08.07.1999, and the record did not disclose any apparent infirmity or want of jurisdiction in the impugned order. The objection raised by the Revenue was left for consideration at the stage of final disposal of the appeal, and no prima facie case was made out for grant of stay.
Conclusion: The request for stay was rejected and the operation of the impugned order-in-appeal was not stayed.
TaxTMI 
