<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (9) TMI 1498 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189069</link>
    <description>The Tribunal denied the Revenue&#039;s stay application concerning an Order-in-Appeal, finding that the authorities had validly supported the respondent&#039;s refund claim under Notification No.33/99-CE. The Tribunal determined that the orders were not jurisdictionally flawed and lacked any defects, dismissing the stay application for insufficiency. The decision was rendered by Dr. D.M. Misra in open court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2016 15:41:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=453043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (9) TMI 1498 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189069</link>
      <description>The Tribunal denied the Revenue&#039;s stay application concerning an Order-in-Appeal, finding that the authorities had validly supported the respondent&#039;s refund claim under Notification No.33/99-CE. The Tribunal determined that the orders were not jurisdictionally flawed and lacked any defects, dismissing the stay application for insufficiency. The decision was rendered by Dr. D.M. Misra in open court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=189069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>