Tribunal corrects amendment year but rejects name change plea in landmark decision The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's miscellaneous application, correcting the error in the amendment year from 1987 to 1984 in the order but ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tribunal corrects amendment year but rejects name change plea in landmark decision
The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's miscellaneous application, correcting the error in the amendment year from 1987 to 1984 in the order but rejected the plea to substitute the new name of the company in the order. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of accuracy in legal references and upheld the original name used in the petition. The order was pronounced on 23.9.2016, ensuring clarity in the legal proceedings.
Issues involved: Rectification of mistakes apparent from the record in the "Statement of case" referred to the High Court, correction of the amendment year in the order, substitution of the new name of the assessee in the order.
Analysis: 1. The assessee filed a miscellaneous application seeking rectification of mistakes in the "Statement of case" referred to the High Court. The issue arose due to an error in mentioning the year of the amendment in the order passed by the Tribunal. The amendment regarding interest u/s 214 was made by the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984, but it was incorrectly stated as 1987 in the order. The Tribunal acknowledged the mistake and corrected it by replacing all instances of "Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1987" with "Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984."
2. The Tribunal modified paragraph 4 of the order to reflect the correct amendment year and questions to be referred. The questions included whether the Tribunal was justified in upholding the order passed under section 263 and whether the amendment inserting sub-section (1A) in section 214 by the Direct Tax Laws (Amendment) Act, 1984, providing for interest grant, was applicable to the case. The rectification was necessary to ensure accuracy in the legal references and implications.
3. Additionally, the assessee requested a change in the name of the company from "Tata Press Limited" to "Infomedia Press Limited" in the order. The company had undergone name changes after the order was passed, and the assessee provided the Certificate of Incorporation to support the name change. However, the Tribunal noted that the order was passed in the name in which the petition was filed, and the subsequent name changes did not constitute a mistake apparent from the record. Therefore, the plea to substitute the new name was rejected.
4. Ultimately, the Tribunal partly allowed the miscellaneous application filed by the assessee, correcting the error in the amendment year while rejecting the plea to substitute the new name of the assessee in the order. The order was pronounced in court on 23.9.2016, ensuring clarity and accuracy in the legal proceedings and references.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
