<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (9) TMI 1246 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188220</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s miscellaneous application, correcting the error in the amendment year from 1987 to 1984 in the order but rejected the plea to substitute the new name of the company in the order. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of accuracy in legal references and upheld the original name used in the petition. The order was pronounced on 23.9.2016, ensuring clarity in the legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:46:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448646" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (9) TMI 1246 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188220</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee&#039;s miscellaneous application, correcting the error in the amendment year from 1987 to 1984 in the order but rejected the plea to substitute the new name of the company in the order. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of accuracy in legal references and upheld the original name used in the petition. The order was pronounced on 23.9.2016, ensuring clarity in the legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188220</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>