Appellant wins duty payment dispute, relieved from pre-deposit, interest & penalty. Extended limitation not applicable. The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, a unit of M/s Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd., in a case involving duty payment disputes. The appellant ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appellant wins duty payment dispute, relieved from pre-deposit, interest & penalty. Extended limitation not applicable.
The Tribunal found in favor of the appellant, a unit of M/s Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd., in a case involving duty payment disputes. The appellant was relieved from further pre-deposit requirements after having paid a significant portion of the demanded amount. The Tribunal ruled that the extended period of limitation did not apply to a portion of the duty confirmed due to ongoing disputes and subsequent duty payments. Additionally, the pre-deposit requirement for interest and penalty was waived, and the stay petition was granted.
Issues involved: Application to dispense with pre-deposit of duty confirmed for the period February 2005 to January 2010, along with penalty imposition.
Summary: 1. The appellant, a unit of M/s Haryana Vidyut Prasaran Nigam Ltd., was engaged in manufacturing galvanised steel parts of transmission towers. The demand comprised two parts: - Approximately &8377; 2.00 crores confirmed for February 2005 to April 2007 due to a previous dispute resolved in their favor. - About &8377; 4.13 crores for undervaluation of products cleared for job work from May 2007 to January 2010.
2. The appellant argued a bona fide belief in not paying duty due to past dispute resolution and entitlement to Notification No. 74/93. The Revenue contended duty liability under Chapter Note 3 to Chapter 73 from 2003 onwards.
3. The Tribunal found that the appellant had paid &8377; 3.86 crores out of the &8377; 4.13 crores demanded for undervaluation, thus dispensing with the need for further pre-deposit.
4. Regarding the &8377; 2.00 crores duty confirmed for February 2005 to April 2007, the Tribunal held the extended period of limitation was not applicable due to the ongoing dispute and the appellant's duty payments from May 2007 onwards. The Tribunal dispensed with the pre-deposit condition for this amount as well.
5. The pre-deposit of interest and penalty was also disposed of, with the stay petition being allowed accordingly.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
