Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a reference application under Section 66(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1922 was within time when it was made after the Tribunal's rectification order under Section 35 and whether the Tribunal could validly state a case on that basis.
Analysis: The period for seeking a reference under Section 66(1) runs from service of the order made under Section 33(4), and the later rectification under Section 35 only corrects an apparent mistake in the record. Such rectification does not amount to a fresh order giving rise to a new limitation period for reference. If it were otherwise, the four-year rectification power could indirectly revive a reference right that had already expired, which would defeat the statutory scheme. The High Court also held that it was competent to examine whether the Tribunal had acted within the limits of the statute in making the reference.
Conclusion: The application for reference made on 29 March 1945 was time-barred and the Tribunal had no authority to refer the question to the High Court; the preliminary objection succeeded and the reference was incompetent.
Ratio Decidendi: A rectification order under Section 35 of the Income-tax Act, 1922 does not create a fresh order for the purpose of limitation under Section 66(1); the right to seek a reference remains tied to the original appeal order.