2017 (7) TMI 1375 - AT - Income Tax

ITAT Chennai: Assessing Officer's Book Profit Rectification Upheld

Virgo Properties Pvt. Ltd. Versus Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle – 3 (2), Chennai

Virgo Properties Pvt. Ltd. Versus Asst. Commissioner of Income Tax, Corporate Circle – 3 (2), Chennai - TMI Issues:1. Maintainability of the order u/s. 154 for assessing book profit.Analysis:The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chennai pertained to the order dated 27.03.2017 by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-11, Chennai, dismissing the assessee's appeal contesting the order u/s. 154 dated 06.10.2015 for assessment year (AY) 2011-12. The primary issue in this case was the correctness of the order u/s. 154 seeking to assess the book profit of the assessee at the 'correct' figure. The assessee had initially disclosed a book profit of &8377; 506,04,764/-, which was later revised to &8377; 64,64,764/- by making adjustments in a return filed on 27.06.2012. The Assessing Officer (AO) issued a notice u/s. 154(3) stating that the book profit had been wrongly assessed and needed to be corrected to &8377; 506,04,764/-. The dispute revolved around whether the AO had the authority to rectify the book profit figure.Upon careful consideration, the Tribunal found that the assessee had indeed initially returned the book profit as per the profit and loss account, which was later revised to a lower amount. The Revenue had assessed the lower book profit figure through the provisions of s. 154. The Tribunal noted that the AO had made the adjustment without any objection raised by the assessee and that the ld. CIT(A) also found the adjustment to be in accordance with the law. The Tribunal emphasized that no objection had been raised on the merits of the adjustment at any stage. The Tribunal further clarified that the word 'mistake' under s. 154 is broad in scope and includes omissions on the part of the authority to assess the correct figures. The Tribunal also discussed the limitations of s. 154 in altering figures, emphasizing that debatable issues are beyond the purview of s. 154.In the context of s. 115-JB, which deals with book profit, the Tribunal highlighted that only specified adjustments under Explanation-1 to s. 115JB can be made to arrive at the book profit. The Tribunal observed that the adjustments made by the assessee did not correspond to the specified adjustments, raising questions about the validity of the revision. The Tribunal also pointed out that capital gains on transactions in securities are specified for reduction only in the case of a foreign company, implying that for other entities, such reductions are not applicable. Based on these considerations, the Tribunal confirmed the rectification made by the AO and dismissed the assessee's appeal.In conclusion, the Tribunal upheld the impugned order, emphasizing the correctness of the rectification made by the AO. The decision was pronounced on July 31, 2017, at Chennai.