Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Appellate Tribunal had jurisdiction to entertain a miscellaneous application and whether any valid reference to the High Court could arise from the Tribunal's order in the absence of a proper appeal under the Act.
Analysis: The right of reference under the Income-tax Act depended on there being an order made by the Appellate Tribunal in a proper appeal arising under the statutory appellate scheme. The Income-tax Officer's recomputation after giving effect to the Tribunal's earlier directions was not an order made under the assessment provisions so as to support an appeal. The Appellate Assistant Commissioner's refusal to admit the appeal therefore could not be treated as an order under the appellate provisions, and the subsequent miscellaneous application before the Tribunal was not an appeal under the Act. As the Tribunal acted only on a supposed inherent power, its order on that application was not an order under the appellate section, and no question of law could arise out of such an order for the purpose of reference.
Conclusion: The reference was incompetent for want of jurisdiction, and the High Court was right in declining to answer the questions.