Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether salary earned by a non-resident seaman for services rendered mostly outside India accrued or arose in India so as to be taxable in India under section 5(2)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: The assessee was employed as Chief Engineer of a vessel and remained outside India for the entire accounting period except for eight days. The agreement of employment was outside India and the remuneration was received outside India. The decisive factor for accrual of salary income was held to be the place where the services were rendered, not the place of contract or the source from which payment was made. Advances paid in foreign waters were treated as part payment of wages earned for services rendered outside India, and the brief presence in India did not justify apportionment of the salary as Indian income.
Conclusion: The salary income did not accrue or arise in India and was not taxable in India; the Revenue's appeal failed.