Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Revenue's appeal was maintainable in view of the low tax effect and the CBDT instruction prescribing a monetary limit for filing departmental appeals.
Analysis: The tax effect involved in the appeal was found to be less than Rs. 3 lakhs. In view of Instruction No. 3 of 2011 issued by the CBDT, appeals involving tax effect below the prescribed monetary threshold were not maintainable. Since the appeal did not satisfy the monetary limit, it could not be entertained on merits.
Conclusion: The Revenue's appeal was held to be not maintainable and was dismissed in limine.
Final Conclusion: The departmental appeal failed at the threshold on account of the applicable monetary limit, leaving the assessee's position undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: An appeal by the Revenue is not maintainable where the tax effect is below the monetary limit prescribed by the applicable CBDT instruction.