TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court limits Die-in-Harness Scheme to regular govt employees, not work-charged ones or dependents.</h1> The Supreme Court held that the Die-in-Harness Scheme for compassionate appointments in Manipur applies only to regular government employees, not ... - Issues involved: The judgment deals with the issues related to appointment on compassionate grounds under the Die-in-Harness Scheme framed by the Government of Manipur.Appointment on Compassionate Grounds:- The Die-in-Harness Scheme was initially framed by the Government of Manipur to provide appointment to dependents of deceased government servants.- The Scheme was modified through corrigendum and revised later to specify eligibility criteria and application deadlines.- The Scheme was revised to clarify that it is applicable only to regular government employees and not to work-charged, ad hoc, or casual appointees.- The High Court allowed writ petitions seeking appointment under the Scheme for dependents of deceased work-charged employees, contrary to the revised Scheme.- The Supreme Court held that confirmation of a work-charged employee does not change their status, and the Scheme does not apply to work-charged employees or their dependents.- Dismissal of a special leave petition does not imply acceptance of the lower court's decision, and such dismissal does not establish binding precedent under Article 141 of the Constitution.- The judgments of the High Court directing consideration for appointment under the Scheme were set aside, and the appeals were allowed.Separate Judgement by Judges:- No separate judgment was delivered by the judges in this case.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
