Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Commissioner was required to decide the petitioner's application under the U. P. Sales Tax Rules for issuance of directions, and whether the assessment proceedings could be finalised before such decision.
Analysis: The Rules empowered the Commissioner to issue directions on an application by a party. Once such an application had been made, the authority was obliged to apply his mind and take a decision one way or the other. Since the assessment for the relevant year was pending and could result in a liability against the petitioner, the Court also considered it appropriate to protect the petitioner from adverse finalisation until the application was disposed of.
Conclusion: The Commissioner was directed to decide the application within four weeks, and the assessment for the relevant year was to remain unfinalised, or if already made, not to be given effect to, until disposal of that application.
Final Conclusion: The petitioner obtained limited substantive relief by securing a time-bound decision on its application and interim protection against final assessment action pending that decision.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statutory authority is empowered to issue directions on application, the authority must decide the application within a reasonable time, and pending such decision the connected assessment action may be restrained to prevent prejudice.