Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the adjudication order was vitiated for breach of principles of natural justice and whether the availability of an alternative remedy barred writ relief.
Analysis: The record showed that the final hearing was not concluded on the date recorded in the adjudication order. Subsequent correspondence from the department required the assessee to furnish further documents and fixed another hearing date, and the respondents did not dispute the assessee's assertion that additional time had been sought and assured. On these facts, the adjudication was completed without affording a fair opportunity of hearing. The existence of an alternative remedy did not prevent writ interference because violation of natural justice is a recognised exception to the rule of exhaustion of remedies.
Conclusion: The adjudication order was set aside as it was passed in breach of natural justice, and the objection based on alternate remedy was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The matter was restored to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision after giving due opportunity to the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an adjudication is completed without a fair opportunity of hearing, writ jurisdiction may be exercised despite the availability of an alternative remedy.