Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether section 40 of the Finance Act, 1983, levying wealth-tax on closely-held companies, was unconstitutional as violating article 14 of the Constitution of India for want of rational classification.
Analysis: The challenge was examined on the basis that closely-held companies were allegedly treated alike despite differences between companies that held transferred assets to avoid wealth-tax and companies carrying on genuine business. The classification was upheld because private companies and public companies constitute distinct classes under company law, closely-held companies enjoy special privileges not available to public companies, and the levy operated uniformly on all companies within the specified class. The Court held that a taxation measure is invalid under article 14 only if there is no reasonable basis for the classification or if similarly situated property is subjected to unequal taxation. The legislative choice to levy wealth-tax on closely-held companies at two per cent, with exclusions for certain business assets, was found to rest on a reasonable basis and not on arbitrariness.
Conclusion: Section 40 of the Finance Act, 1983, was held to be constitutionally valid and not violative of article 14.