Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee, who developed a housing project on land not owned by it and where approval stood in the landowners' names, was entitled to deduction under section 80IB(10) of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether profits attributable to unutilized FSI also qualified for the deduction.
Analysis: The assessee had entered into a development agreement under which it obtained possession and dominant control over the land, undertook the entire development and construction at its own cost and risk, obtained necessary permissions and bore the project expenses. The statutory provision, as applied in the earlier tribunal decisions relied upon, required an undertaking developing and building an approved housing project and did not expressly mandate legal ownership of the land. The Tribunal examined the terms of the agreement in the light of the governing precedents and held that the decisive factor was whether the assessee acted as a developer with control and risk in the project or merely as a contractor for fixed remuneration. On the facts found, the assessee's arrangement was treated as a development arrangement, and the claim relating to unutilized FSI was also covered by the same line of reasoning.
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to deduction under section 80IB(10), including the component relatable to unutilized FSI.