TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court emphasizes eyewitness testimony and confession corroboration in criminal cases</h1> <h3>Shrishail Nageshi Pare Versus State Of Maharashtra</h3> Shrishail Nageshi Pare Versus State Of Maharashtra - 1985 AIR 866, 1985 (3) SCR 461, 1985 (2) SCC 341, 1985 (1) SCALE 1040 The Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition by the first accused in a criminal case, criticizing the High Court's misapplication of legal principles regarding the weight of evidence, including eyewitness testimony and confessions. The Court emphasized that a truthful eyewitness account can be sufficient for a conviction and that a confession, if corroborated, can also form the basis for a conviction. The High Court's view that a confession alone cannot prove guilt was deemed erroneous.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
