https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182850 Truthful eyewitness testimony, if accepted, is ordinarily sufficient to sustain conviction without depending on corroboration from recovery or other evidence. A retracted confession may also support conviction if it receives independent corroboration, but the confession of one accused cannot, by itself, convict a co-accused though it may be considered with other evidence. On the special leave challenge, the Court found no error of law because the petition rested only on reappreciation of evidence, which did not justify interference. The Special Leave Petition was dismissed, and the High Court's contrary observations on the evidentiary value of eyewitnesses and confessions were corrected. en-us Mon, 25 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 May 2016 10:44:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182850 Truthful eyewitness testimony, if accepted, is ordinarily sufficient to sustain conviction without depending on corroboration from recovery or other evidence. A retracted confession may also support conviction if it receives independent corroboration, but the confession of one accused cannot, by itself, convict a co-accused though it may be considered with other evidence. On the special leave challenge, the Court found no error of law because the petition rested only on reappreciation of evidence, which did not justify interference. The Special Leave Petition was dismissed, and the High Court's contrary observations on the evidentiary value of eyewitnesses and confessions were corrected. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 25 Mar 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=182850