Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a retired Member of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, who retired after the insertion of Rule 13E, could appear and argue before the Tribunal despite being otherwise qualified under section 288 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
Analysis: Rule 13E inserted in the ITAT Members (Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Rules, 1963 barred Members retiring on or after the notified date from appearing before the Tribunal. The Tribunal followed the Special Bench ruling and held that the crucial date is the date of retirement, not the date of recruitment. It further held that even if a person is otherwise qualified to act under section 288 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, the bar under Rule 13E would still apply. The challenge based on Article 14 and the argument that the rule could not override the statute were not accepted for the purpose of the present proceeding.
Conclusion: The retired Member was held ineligible to appear and argue before the Tribunal, and was discharged from the case.