Assessee prevails in tax dispute over disallowances; Tribunal rules in favor, dismissing Revenue's appeal. The Tribunal held that the assessee had no permanent establishment in India. The Tribunal allowed various grounds of the assessee related to disallowances ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Assessee prevails in tax dispute over disallowances; Tribunal rules in favor, dismissing Revenue's appeal.
The Tribunal held that the assessee had no permanent establishment in India. The Tribunal allowed various grounds of the assessee related to disallowances under section 40(a)(i) for payments made to different entities. The department's appeal regarding the deletion of disallowance for payment made to PanAmSat was dismissed. The assessee's appeal was allowed, while the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. The order was pronounced on May 28, 2012.
Issues involved: Cross appeals by the assessee and department against the order of CIT(A)-XXXIII, Mumbai, regarding assessment year 2004-05.
Assessee's Appeal (ITA No.3832/Mum/2008): - Issue 1: Whether the assessee had a permanent establishment in India. - The Tribunal held that the assessee has no permanent establishment in India, in line with the view taken in the assessment year 2001-02. - Issue 2: Applicability of sec. 40(a)(i). - Ground on this issue was dismissed as not pressed. - Issue 3: Disallowance u/s. 40(a)(i) on payment to Advanced Satellite International Ltd. for pay out charges. - The Tribunal allowed this ground of the assessee, consistent with the view taken in the assessment year 2002-03. - Issue 4: Disallowance u/s. 40(a)(i) on purchase of programmes from LMB Holdings (Mauritius) Ltd. - The Tribunal allowed this ground of the assessee, in line with the view taken in the assessment year 2002-03. - Issue 5: Disallowance u/s. 40(a)(i) on payment made to LMB Holdings Ltd. (Isle of Man) for purchase of films. - The Tribunal allowed this ground of the assessee, consistent with the view taken in the assessment year 2002-03. - The appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Departmental Appeal (ITA No.3843/Mum/2008): - Sole Issue: Deletion of disallowance u/s. 40(a)(i) for payment made to PanAmSat towards transponder hire charges. - The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, as the issue was the same as ground no. 3 for assessment year 2002-03. - The appeal of the assessee was allowed, while the appeal of the Revenue was dismissed.
Order: Pronounced on the 28th day of May, 2012.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
