https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181278 The Tribunal held that the assessee had no permanent establishment in India. The Tribunal allowed various grounds of the assessee related to disallowances under section 40(a)(i) for payments made to different entities. The department's appeal regarding the deletion of disallowance for payment made to PanAmSat was dismissed. The assessee's appeal was allowed, while the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. The order was pronounced on May 28, 2012. en-us Mon, 28 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 12 Apr 2016 12:56:39 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181278 The Tribunal held that the assessee had no permanent establishment in India. The Tribunal allowed various grounds of the assessee related to disallowances under section 40(a)(i) for payments made to different entities. The department's appeal regarding the deletion of disallowance for payment made to PanAmSat was dismissed. The assessee's appeal was allowed, while the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. The order was pronounced on May 28, 2012. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 28 May 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=181278