Reasoned transfer orders under income-tax law must record reasons before shifting jurisdiction; unreasoned transfer was quashed.

An order transferring an assessee's case under section 127 of the Income-tax Act must record reasons and communicate them where the transfer affects the assessee prejudicially. The text states that the transfer order was examined against this statutory requirement and the broader rule that administrative orders affecting jurisdiction must be reasoned. Because the order contained no recorded reasons, it was treated as contrary to section 127 and inconsistent with the requirement of a speaking order in transfer matters. The stated result is that the transfer order was invalid and liable to be quashed for want of recorded reasons.

---

---

Issues: Whether an order transferring the assessee's case under section 127 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was valid when it did not record reasons.

Analysis: The transfer order was examined in light of the statutory requirement under section 127 and the principle that reasons must be recorded and communicated where an administrative order prejudicially affects the assessee. The absence of any recorded reasons in the transfer order rendered it contrary to the statutory mandate and inconsistent with the rule requiring a reasoned order in matters of transfer between jurisdictions.

Conclusion: The transfer order was invalid and liable to be quashed for want of recorded reasons.

---