<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1996 (5) TMI 41 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17867</link>
    <description>An order transferring an assessee&#039;s case under section 127 of the Income-tax Act must record reasons and communicate them where the transfer affects the assessee prejudicially. The text states that the transfer order was examined against this statutory requirement and the broader rule that administrative orders affecting jurisdiction must be reasoned. Because the order contained no recorded reasons, it was treated as contrary to section 127 and inconsistent with the requirement of a speaking order in transfer matters. The stated result is that the transfer order was invalid and liable to be quashed for want of recorded reasons.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 12:59:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=56867" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1996 (5) TMI 41 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17867</link>
      <description>An order transferring an assessee&#039;s case under section 127 of the Income-tax Act must record reasons and communicate them where the transfer affects the assessee prejudicially. The text states that the transfer order was examined against this statutory requirement and the broader rule that administrative orders affecting jurisdiction must be reasoned. Because the order contained no recorded reasons, it was treated as contrary to section 127 and inconsistent with the requirement of a speaking order in transfer matters. The stated result is that the transfer order was invalid and liable to be quashed for want of recorded reasons.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 1996 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=17867</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>