Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the correspondence between the parties amounted to a completed lease or only an agreement to lease, and whether such correspondence was liable to stamp duty under the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958.
Analysis: The notice invited an offer for lease and the respondent made its offer expressly as a promoter for a cooperative housing society. The acceptance by the Government, read with the surrounding correspondence, showed that no present demise had taken place and that the parties had only bound themselves to execute a lease in future. The documents also showed that the respondent was consistently recognised as acting as promoter, and the Government subsequently sanctioned transfer of the rights, title and interest in favour of the cooperative society. A mere agreement to lease, not creating an immediate demise, does not amount to a lease and is not an instrument chargeable to duty. The benefit of such an executory agreement could validly be assigned in the manner undertaken here.
Conclusion: The instrument was only an agreement to lease and not a lease. It was not chargeable to stamp duty, and the demand raised by the revenue was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: An executory agreement to lease that does not create a present demise is not a lease and is not chargeable as such to stamp duty; the contractual benefit of that agreement may be assigned where the surrounding circumstances and governmental consent support that course.