Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a Magistrate can entertain and grant bail to an accused who is not in the custody of that court, and whether issuance of a production warrant under Section 267 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 amounts to custody of the issuing court.
Analysis: Bail under Section 437 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is available only when the accused is arrested, detained, appears before the court, or is otherwise within the control of that court. The same custody requirement governs Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, because bail is a release from custody and can be ordered only by the court in whose custody the accused is for the time being. A production warrant under Section 267 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is only a direction to produce the accused and does not itself place the accused in the custody of the issuing court unless he is actually produced before it and submits to its jurisdiction. The authorities relied upon were distinguished or read as not laying down any contrary rule.
Conclusion: The accused was not in the custody of the Faizabad court merely because a production warrant had been issued, and that court could not consider the bail application until actual production or custody was obtained.
Ratio Decidendi: Bail can be granted only by the court having actual custody or physical control over the accused, and a production warrant does not by itself create such custody.