Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2007 (4) TMI 689 - SC - Indian Laws

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Appeals Allowed, High Court Judgment Set Aside. Criteria for Promotion of Diploma to Degree Engineers Clarified The appeals were allowed, and the impugned judgment of the High Court was set aside. The writ petitions were remitted back to the Division Bench of the ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
                        Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.

                            Appeals Allowed, High Court Judgment Set Aside. Criteria for Promotion of Diploma to Degree Engineers Clarified

                            The appeals were allowed, and the impugned judgment of the High Court was set aside. The writ petitions were remitted back to the Division Bench of the High Court for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court's interpretation. The Court emphasized that diploma-holder Junior Engineers who obtain a degree during service must complete three years of service after obtaining the degree to be eligible for promotion in the degree-holder quota.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Transfer and retransfer of the Slum Wing Department (SWD) between Municipal Corporation of Delhi (MCD) and Delhi Development Authority (DDA).
                            2. Recruitment and promotion rules for Junior Engineers, Assistant Engineers, and Executive Engineers.
                            3. Differential service experience requirements for diploma-holders and degree-holders for promotions.
                            4. Validity of the Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) Note of 1971.
                            5. Interpretation of service rules regarding the eligibility for promotion.
                            6. Application of the principle of res judicata.

                            Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Transfer and Retransfer of SWD:
                            The SWD, initially part of MCD, was transferred to DDA in 1974 with a stipulation that only its employees would be considered for confirmation and promotions. It was re-transferred to MCD in 1978 and then back to DDA in 1980, again with the stipulation that it would remain a separate entity without merging with DDA.

                            2. Recruitment and Promotion Rules:
                            The DDA adopted CPWD's Recruitment Rules for Junior Engineers, Assistant Engineers, and Executive Engineers. Junior Engineer posts were meant for 100% direct recruitment, requiring a Diploma in Civil Engineering with two years' experience. Degree-holders could also apply without prior experience. Assistant Engineer posts were filled 50% by direct recruitment or deputation from degree-holders and 50% by promotion from Junior Engineers. For promotions, diploma-holders required eight years of service, while degree-holders needed three years. Promotion to Executive Engineer required eight years of service for degree-holders and ten years for diploma-holders.

                            3. Differential Service Experience Requirements:
                            The rules prescribed different service experiences for diploma-holders and degree-holders for promotions. This distinction was challenged but upheld by the Supreme Court in Roop Chand Adlakha v. Delhi Development Authority, which recognized the validity of different service requirements based on educational qualifications.

                            4. Validity of the DPC Note of 1971:
                            The DPC appended a Note in 1971 relaxing the rules for diploma-holders who acquired degrees, allowing them to be considered for promotion as Assistant Engineers. This Note was challenged and ultimately deemed ultra vires by the Full Bench of the Delhi High Court, as it violated statutory rules and was not approved by the DDA.

                            5. Interpretation of Service Rules:
                            The Supreme Court examined whether the three years' service experience required for promotion to Assistant Engineer should be counted from the date of obtaining the degree or include the service period prior to obtaining the degree. The Court concluded that the service experience required for promotion in the degree-holder quota must be as a degree-holder Junior Engineer. The service rendered as a diploma-holder cannot be substituted for the service rendered as a degree-holder.

                            6. Application of the Principle of Res Judicata:
                            The Full Bench of the Delhi High Court held that the principle of res judicata did not apply because a wrong interpretation of a statute that affects fundamental rights would render a decision nullity. Therefore, the earlier decisions based on misinterpretation did not attract the principle of res judicata.

                            Conclusion:
                            The appeals were allowed, and the impugned judgment of the High Court was set aside. The writ petitions were remitted back to the Division Bench of the High Court for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court's interpretation. The Court emphasized that diploma-holder Junior Engineers who obtain a degree during service must complete three years of service after obtaining the degree to be eligible for promotion in the degree-holder quota.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found