Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in allowing the appeal without considering Rule 7(4) of the Central Excise Rules, 2001, and whether it had power to set aside the order and waive interest despite failure to pay duty on the prescribed dates and failure to finalise provisional assessment within the time allowed under Rule 7(3) of the Central Excise Rules, 2001.
Analysis: The questions raised were identical to those already decided between the same parties in the connected matter. The earlier decision, following the Supreme Court's ruling on provisional assessment and interest consequences, had answered the issue in favour of the revenue. Applying that binding view, the Tribunal's order could not be sustained.
Conclusion: The questions of law were answered in favour of the revenue, and the Tribunal's order was set aside while the original authority's order was restored.