Delayed show-cause notice for excise demand after on-site fabrication work held time-barred; appeal dismissed on limitation. The dominant issue was whether the demand was barred by limitation due to a show cause notice issued nearly two years after the relevant period. The SC ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Delayed show-cause notice for excise demand after on-site fabrication work held time-barred; appeal dismissed on limitation.
The dominant issue was whether the demand was barred by limitation due to a show cause notice issued nearly two years after the relevant period. The SC upheld the Tribunal's finding that the demand was time-barred, finding no basis to interfere on limitation. Consequent to limitation being dispositive, the SC declined to examine the merits of whether on-site fabrication and construction activity amounted to manufacture of excisable goods. The civil appeal was dismissed.
The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal regarding the manufacturing of trusses for a bridge construction, upholding the Tribunal's decision on limitation. No costs were awarded. (Case: 2002 (5) TMI 848 - SC)
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.